SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 109

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Shubham Mangal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vijay Dutta Sharma,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA

th

ON THE 7 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 54650 of 2023

SHUBHAM MANGAL

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Harshit Sharma - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Satendra Singh Sikarwar - PP for the State.

Shri Yogesh Singhal- Advocate for the respondent No.2.

ORDER gave rupees to the tuneof Rs. 21 lakhs & 15 tola gold in marriage. After some days, the petitioner& respondent no.2 started quarrelling on trivial issues and it is alleged that petitioner used to exert violence on the private respondent No.2 .It is further alleged that on dated 01.03.2023, when the petitioner went for a meeting to Indore accompanying respondent no.2, in the morning they had fight and when the petitioner came back from the meeting at around 08.00 PM, where the respondent no.2 was sitting in the temple and petitioner asked her to get back home, wherein as he was afraid, she refused to go and it is alleged that petitioner smashed the head of the respondent no.2 on the wall and assaulted her due to which she suffered injuries, wherefore, she came to her maternal house and reported the incident

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top