Back
SANJIV KHANNA, SANJAY KUMAR, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Priyambada Sharma, etc. etc. – Appellant
Versus
Board of Governors In Supersession of Medical Council of India & Ors. etc. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dr. priyambada sharma's studies (Para 2) |
| 2. permission to complete studies (Para 3) |
| 3. imposition of costs (Para 4) |
| 4. disposal of review petitions (Para 5) |
| 5. modification of previous judgment (Para 6) |
| 6. disposal of pending applications (Para 7) |
ORDER
2. As far as Dr. Priyambada Sharma is concerned, it is stated that she had continued with her studies till the judgment dated 17.10.2022 was passed. In view of the said judgment, she was prevented from continuing with her further studies. It is stated that Dr. Priyambada Sharma had taken admission on 17.07.2019.
4. At the same time, we deem it appropriate to impose consolidated costs of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs only) on the authorities concerned, viz., the University and the College, which shall be borne by them jointly and equally, which will be deposited in the Chief Minister’s Relief Fund, Government of West Bengal, within four weeks from the date a copy of this order is received by them.
6. The judgment dated 17.10.2022 shall stand reviewed and modified to the extent indicated above.
The court upheld the validity of degrees awarded to Senior Residents and allowed a student to continue her studies, imposing costs on the authorities for prior hindrance.
The authority's decision to deny study leave based on previous usage and potential adverse impact on public healthcare services is valid and not discriminatory.
The Court emphasized that minimal deficiencies should not negate renewals for educational institutions, ensuring student admissions are preserved in public interest.
The denial of study leave to a medical officer during a pandemic is justified when based on expert assessments of public service needs, and such decisions are not subject to judicial review unless pr....
The decision to grant study leave to government servants is not a matter of right and must be considered in light of the exigencies of public service, as per Rule 50 of the Central Civil Services (Le....
The decision to deny study leave was based on the public interest and the exigencies of the services, considering the Central Civil Service (Leave) Rules, 1972, Rule 50, and the OM dated 2nd November....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
