SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 252

SANJIV KHANNA, SANJAY KUMAR, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Priyambada Sharma, etc. etc. – Appellant
Versus
Board of Governors In Supersession of Medical Council of India & Ors. etc. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Adv. Mr. Vikram Patralekh, Adv. Mr. Braj Kishore Mishra, AOR Mr. B.S. Rajesh Agrajit, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Rana, Adv. Mrs. Meetu Goswami, Adv. Ms. Priya Nagar, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Goswami, Adv. Mr. Shyamal Kumar, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR Ms. Manisha Pandey, Adv. Mr. Rahul Kushwaha, Adv. Mr. Shubhankar, Adv. Mr. M.K. Rathor, Adv. Mr. Reegan S. Bel, Adv. Mr. Pranshu Kaushal, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Singh, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Raj, Adv. Mr. Paranjay Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Adv./AOR Mr. Anando Mukherjee, AOR

Table of Content
1. dr. priyambada sharma's studies (Para 2)
2. permission to complete studies (Para 3)
3. imposition of costs (Para 4)
4. disposal of review petitions (Para 5)
5. modification of previous judgment (Para 6)
6. disposal of pending applications (Para 7)

ORDER

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and given the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the present review petitions deserve to be allowed to the extent that the review petitioners who have completed their studies in the month of July 2022, and were thereafter appointed and were working as Senior Residents, should not be deprived of their degrees. In other words, the degrees awarded to them, despite the judgment of this Court dated 17.10.2022 passed in the civil appeals, would be treated as legal and valid. This does not include Dr. Priyambada Sharma.

2. As far as Dr. Priyambada Sharma is concerned, it is stated that she had continued with her studies till the judgment dated 17.10.2022 was passed. In view of the said judgment, she was prevented from continuing with her further studies. It is stated that Dr. Priyambada Sharma had taken admission on 17.07.2019.

3. Keeping in view the fact that Dr. Priyam

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top