IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT

th

ON THE 6 OF JANUARY, 2026

WRIT PETITION No. 641 of 2015

VEERESH KUMAR TYAGI

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Pratip Visoriya - Advocate for petitioner.

Shri Rajendra Jain – Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

This petition, under Article 226 of Constitution of India, has been filed

seeking the following relief (s):

“1. That, the order dated 31.12.2014 passed by respondent No.4 (Annexure P/1) may kindly be quashed and petitioner be permitted to

continue on the post in question.

2. That, cost of the petition may kindly be granted.

3. That, order dt. 31.1.2015 (Annexure P/1) may kindly be

quashed.”

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was appointed on the post of Cashier on 26.10.2006. Thereafter, petitioner was transferred to Datia. It is further submitted that petitioner has performed his duties sincerely and

honestly and they were extended time to time. It is further submitted that respondent No. 4, who was personally biased against the petitioner, issued a show-cause notice dated 15.12.2014 with an ulterior and oblique motive, as his illega