SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 705

SHANTANU KEMKAR
Jitendra – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ms. Vandana Kasrekar for petitioner; Arvind Gokhale, Government Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3.

ORDER

1. By this petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has challenged the order dated 18.6.2005 (Annexure P9) by which his services have been terminated by the 3rd respondent.

2. The petitioner was appointed initially vide order dated 30.1.1996 on contract basis on the post of District Project Coordinator, Dhar under "Rajeev Gandhi Prathmik Shiksha Mission (for short, 'RGPSM'). The period of his appointment was extended from time to time upto 30.4.2005. The 3rd respondent, Mission Director Jila Shiksha Kendra, Dhar issued an order dated 25.5.2005 (Annexure P-6), directing the 4th respondent to take the additional charge of the post of District Project Coordinator Dhar from the petitioner. Aggrieved, the petitioner submitted a representation and filed a writ petition No. 1041 of 2005 before this Court. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 2.6.2005, directing the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's

representation within four weeks. However, the respondents had passed the impugned termination order dated 18.6.2005 (Annexure P-9) informing therein that the decision has been taken on 14.6.2005 b











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top