SHANTANU KEMKAR
Jitendra – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. By this petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has challenged the order dated 18.6.2005 (Annexure P9) by which his services have been terminated by the 3rd respondent.
2. The petitioner was appointed initially vide order dated 30.1.1996 on contract basis on the post of District Project Coordinator, Dhar under "Rajeev Gandhi Prathmik Shiksha Mission (for short, 'RGPSM'). The period of his appointment was extended from time to time upto 30.4.2005. The 3rd respondent, Mission Director Jila Shiksha Kendra, Dhar issued an order dated 25.5.2005 (Annexure P-6), directing the 4th respondent to take the additional charge of the post of District Project Coordinator Dhar from the petitioner. Aggrieved, the petitioner submitted a representation and filed a writ petition No. 1041 of 2005 before this Court. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 2.6.2005, directing the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's
representation within four weeks. However, the respondents had passed the impugned termination order dated 18.6.2005 (Annexure P-9) informing therein that the decision has been taken on 14.6.2005 b
1. Shamshersingh v. State of Punjab = [AIR 1974 SC 423]
3. Dipti Prakash Banerjee v. Satyendra Nath Bose, National Centre for Basic Sciences
2. State of U.P. v. Ramchandra Trivedi = [AIR 1976 SC 2547]
4. Radheshyam Gupta v. U.P. Industries Agro = [1999 (2) SCC 21]
5. Rahul Tripathi v. Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Kendra = [2001 (3) MPLJ 616]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.