SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4443

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Priyanka Dhurve – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vikash Kumar Santu,Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA

nd

ON THE 22 OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 34643 of 2025 SMT. PRIYANKA DHURVE Versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sourabh Kumar Sharma - Advocate appearing through Video Conferencing and Shri Vikash Kumar Santu - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Prabhanshu Shukla - Government Advocate for the respondents/State.

Shri Deepak Tiwari - Advocate for respondents No.6 to 19.

ORDER The present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed assailing the order dated 07/08/2025 (Annexure-P/6) passed by Collector, Balaghat, whereby petitioner's Appeal under Section 21(4) of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (in short 'Adhiniyam, 1993'), has been rejected.

2 . It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is an elected Sarpanch of Gram Palehara, Panchayat Birasa, District Balaghat and has assumed the charge of Sarpanch with effect from 14/07/2022. The strength of Panchayat in total is 15 including Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch. Earlier, some of the Panchs tried to move a No Confidence Motion against the petitioner with signatures

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top