Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AVM JONNALAGADDA RAJENDRA, MEMBER, MR. ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, MEMBER
Awadh Wood Products (Cold Storage) – Appellant
Versus
Munna @ Rajiv Gupta – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. evidence and facts of the complaint. (Para 4 , 5 , 12) |
| 2. summary of the appeals and outcomes. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments presented by the petitioner. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. limitations of the national commission's jurisdiction. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. final decision and order. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
JUDGEMENT
AVM JONNALAGADDA RAJENDRA, AVSM, VSM (RETD.), MEMBER
1. By this common order, we shall dispose of Revision Petitions No. 429 to 433 of 2025 arising from a common order dated 28.10.2024 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh (“State Commission”) in F.A. Nos.2766 to 2770 of 2007, affirming the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bahraich (“District Forum”) order dated 09.07.2007 in Complaint Nos. 298 to 302 of 2002 respectively.
2. For the sake of convenience, parties shall be referred to as they were arrayed in the original complaint before the District Forum.
3. Since the facts and questions of law involved in all the Revision Petitions are substantially similar, they are being disposed of by this common order. For ease of reference, Revision Petition No. 429 of 2025 arising out of Complaint No. 299 of 2002 is treated as the lead
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
