Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Inder Jit Singh, President, Sudhir Kumar Jain, Member
M/s Sunlight Dev-Con Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M/s Lodha Healthy Construction and Developers Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. grounds for appeal under consumer protection act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments concerning maintainability of complaint. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. definition of consumer in context of commercial purpose. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's upheld decision regarding non-consumer status. (Para 10 , 12) |
ORDER
DR. INDER JIT SINGH, PRESIDING MEMBER
1. The present First Appeal (FA) has been filed by the Appellant against Respondent as detailed above, under section 19 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 , against the order dated 28.03.2017 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Andhra Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the 'State Commission7), in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 62/2013 inter alia praying for setting aside the impugned order dated 28.03.2017 passed by the State Commission.
2. While the Appellant was Complainant before the State Commission, the Respondents were Opposite Parties before the State Commission. Notice was issued to the Respondent on 20.09.2017.Appellant filed their Written Arguments/Synopsis on 29.01.2024 and respondent has filed their Written Arguments/Synopsis on 28.11.2025. For the sake of convenience, parties will also be reflected to as they were averred by the s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
