Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Sudip Ahluwalia, PM, Sadhna Shanker, M
Pushpa Jagannath Shetty – Appellant
Versus
Sahaj Ankur Realtors – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. agreement terms regarding alternative accommodation were not fulfilled. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. claims for monetary compensation arise from substantial delays and breaches. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 15) |
| 3. court adjudicates on time-bound obligations under the consumer protection act. (Para 14 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. monetary compensation calculated based on established circle rates. (Para 21 , 22 , 24) |
ORDER
JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA, MEMBER This Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 , seeking possession of the Flats or in the alternative the market value of the Flats along with other ancillary reliefs.
2. The factual background, in brief, is that the Complainants entered into a registered Agreement for Permanent Alternative Accommodation dated 20.09.2013 with Opposite Party No.1, Sahaj Ankur Realtors, in respect of their tenanted Flats Nos. 3 and 4 in Building A, Madhav Baug, Andheri (East), Mumbai. Under the said Agreement, the Opposite Party, claiming ownership of the property by virtue of a Deed of Slump Sale of Business dated 16.11.2011, undertook redevelopment of the property and committed to allot the Complainants, o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
