Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
A.P. Sahi, President
Cloud 9 Projects Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Anubhav Gupta & Ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delay in filing review petition explained. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. justification for delay linked to litigation history. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 3. review powers and finality of orders discussed. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. failure to contest proceedings cited. (Para 19 , 26 , 35) |
| 5. review application denied due to lack of merit. (Para 38 , 39 , 48) |
ORDER
(IN CHAMBER)
1. This review application no. 14 of 2026 has been filed alongwith I.A. No.1194 of 2026 praying for condoning the delay of 129 days in the filing of the review petition. The order of which, review has been sought is dated 07.05.2024. This review application has been filed after this Commission has proceeded in execution application no. 141 of 2025 where orders have been passed by a Division Bench of this Commission on 31.07.2025 and 29.10.2025.
2. In paragraph 4 of the delay condonation application, it has been stated that I it was only in late July 2025, that, being confronted with the order dated 31.07.2025, led to the discovery of the existence of ex parte impugned order for the first time. The date of knowledge is 31.07.2025.
3. In paragraph 5 of the delay condonation application, it has been stated that from August till m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
