Back
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL
Sunil Kumar Aggarwal, Judicial Member, Radhakrishna Sreepada, Technical Member
SHANKAR GOVINDASWAMY – Appellant
Versus
Aneesh Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. impleadment application prayers outlined. (Para 1) |
| 2. annual filings discrepancies. (Para 2) |
| 3. no share transfer documents. (Para 3) |
| 4. court notes factual timeline. (Para 5) |
| 5. no share transfers in filings. (Para 6) |
| 6. shareholding claim unsubstantiated. (Para 7) |
| 7. impleadment application dismissed. (Para 8) |
ORDER
Per: RADHAKRISHNA SREEPADA, Member (Technical)
1. The Company Petition has been filed on 21.04.2025 with following prayers;
a) To allow this impleading application and to allow the Applicant to be arrayed as Respondent No.2 to the Petition in C.P.No.92/BB/2024 and consequently provide the Applicant herein to contest the Petition on merits.
b) To allow the Applicant herein to file statement of Objections to the main Petition and contest the main Petition on merits as Respondent No.2;
c) Pass such other order or orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.
2. Facts of the case & Submissions of the Petitioner
a) The Petition IN CP No 92/BB/2024 filed is on 04.09.2024 under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 (‘The Act) read with Rules 11 and 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 (‘Rules’) against the Resp
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
