Back
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Sheo Kumar Singh, Judicial Member, Afroz Ahmad, Expert Member
Rajeev Nayan Tripathi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bio-medical waste storage violations causing infections. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. initial pcb reports highlight incinerator deficiencies. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. tribunal constitutes committee for site inspection. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. committee finds multiple bmw rules violations. (Para 8) |
| 5. project proponent claims compliances and operations. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 15) |
| 6. pcb justifies closure for non-compliances. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. ongoing violations persist despite notices. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 8. cpcb guidelines mandate cbwtf compliances. (Para 20 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 9. proper bmw management prevents disease spread. (Para 22) |
| 10. apply sustainable development and polluter pays. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 11. unit exceeds coverage without upgrades. (Para 35) |
| 12. absolute liability for hazardous activities. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 13. restitution via compound interest for delays. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 14. impose costs for evading environmental compliance. (Para 58) |
| 15. enforce closure, compensation, and remediation. (Para 59 , 60 , 61) |
ORDER
1. The issues raised in this applications are the v
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
