SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 292

THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SIBO SANKAR MISHRA, J.
Uday Pradhan and others - Appellants
Versus
State of Orissa - Respondent
CRA No.438 of 1994
Decided On : 09-12-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Ms. Chetna Prakash, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mrs. Siva Mohanty, Additional Standing Counsel

Convictions under IPC affirmed based on corroborated eyewitness testimony; A3 acquitted due to lack of evidence and identification.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 323 and 324 - Conviction for causing simple injury and grievous injury - Accused No.1 and No.3 convicted under Section 323, sentenced to 3 months R.I.; Accused No.2 convicted under Section 324, sentenced to 6 months R.I. - A thorough investigation was conducted, with eyewitnesses confirming the occurrence of the assault and the involvement of the accused - However, the absence of corroborative evidence led to the acquittal of A3, as no substantial basis was found against him - Evidence revealed injuries sustained by the deceased and injured witnesses, establishing participation of A1 and A2 - Conviction confirmed for A1 and A2, but sentences modified. (Paras 1-12)

Facts of the case:
The appeal challenges convictions stemming from a 1991 incident where assailants attacked villagers, leading to significant injuries and a fatality. The incident involved multiple eyewitnesses who rendered corroborative testimony.

Findings of Court:
The trial court's findings are upheld for A1 and A2, while A3 is acquitted due to lack of corroborating evidence.

Issues: The main issues included the adequacy of evidence for identification of the accused and corroboration of eyewitness accounts.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the absence of corroborative testimony or identification undermined the case against A3, while corroborated evidence affirmed the positions of A1 and A2.

Result: Conviction of A1 and A2 affirmed; A3 acquitted; A2's sentence modified to time served.

Table of Content
1. overview of the appeal and convictions (Para 1 , 2)
2. facts related to the incident and the investigation (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. evidence analysis and findings of assault (Para 6)
4. appellants' arguments on conviction and evidence shortcomings (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. court's decision and modification of sentences (Para 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT :

SIBO SANKAR MISHRA, J.

The present Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 30th of November, 1994 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Puri, in S.T. Case No. 12/271 of 1997, whereby the accused-appellants No.1 and 3 (hereinafter A1 and A3 respectively for brevity) have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code and accused- appellant No.2(hereinafter A2 for brevity) has been convicted for the offence U/s.324 I.P.C. A1 and A3 have been sentenced to undergo a R.I. for 3 months for offence U/s.323 of I.P.C., whereas A2 has been sentenced for six months for the offence U/s.324 of I.P.C.

2. Heard Ms. Chetna Prakash, learned Counsel for the appellants and Mrs. Siva Mohanty, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State.

3. In the present case, the criminal law was set into motion upon the lodging of the First Information Report on 20.01.1991 at Sarankul Police Station. It is pertinent to note that, at the time when the learned Trial Court rendered the judgment of conviction, a total of six accused persons had faced trial, of whom three were acquitted of all charges. At that stage, two other accused persons, namely Kalia Mantri and Ula @ Pabitra Pal, were absconding. Consequently, their cases were segregated from the main trial, which has culminated to the impugned order in the present appeal before this Court.

The informant, Bichi Bisoi (P.W.2), along with the injured persons and the deceased Rama Chandra Bhuyan, are residents of village Dhusuma, whereas the accused persons belong to the adjoining village Sikharpur. According to the prosecution, on 20.01.1991, at about 9:00 A.M., the deceased Rama Chandra Bhuyan, accompanied by Dinabandhu Bisoi (P.W.4), Bhikari Jena (P.W.6), Surendra Behera (P.W.5), Kumar Bisoi (P.W.7), Udaya Swain, and Syam Behera, had proceeded to the lands situated near the Duanta river within the village of the accused persons for the purpose of collecting green grass. While they were collecting grass from the cultivated land of one Jogi Jena, the present accused persons, along with the absconding accused, allegedly arrived at the spot armed with deadly weapons such as lathis, bhali, farsa, bhusa, and other implements. They questioned the presence of the victims on the land and, upon protest, assaulted the deceased as well as the injured witnesses, causing them to fall to the ground with bleeding injuries. On witnessing the assault, the remaining companions fled the scene to alert the villagers of Dhusuma.

Upon being informed, the informant, father of the injured Dinabandhu rushed to the spot along with several villagers. Manu Jena (P.W.3), who was then engaged in operating a sugarcane crusher situated on the outskirts of village Dhusuma, also proceeded to the location. By the time they reached, they found the deceased Rama Chandra Bhuyan and injured Dinabandhu lying senseless in the field, bearing multiple injuries, while the injured Bhikari remained partially conscious. The injured persons were initially shifted to a nearby mango grove where a sugarcane crusher was functioning, and thereafter transported on cots arranged by the villagers to the Sarankul Hospital.

The Medical Officer at Sarankul Hospital admitted Dinabandhu (P.W.4) and Bhikari (P.W.6) for treatment and referred the deceased to the S.C.B. Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, owing to his critical condition. At about 8:30 P.M. on the same day, the informant (P.W.2) appeared at Sarankul Police Station and submitted a written report, on the basis of which the Officer-in-Charge registered the present case and took up in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top