Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Harish Kumar, J
Sudhir Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions challenge the selection process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments contest irregularities in the selection. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. right to information emphasized in legal context. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. commission argues process adherence to rules. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. results and cut-off marks discussed. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. counterarguments about transparency in the selection process. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 7. judicial reasoning about examination participation. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. legality of process acknowledged. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 9. recruitment process adherence to norms. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 10. court observes no merit in petitions. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 11. final merit list and its implications addressed. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 12. court's conclusion and order on the matter. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT
Date : 25-03-2025
The Cluster of the petitioners in both the cases are represented through Mr. Dinu Kumar, learned Advocate for the petitioners with M/s Ritika Rani, learned Advocate. The Bihar Police Sub-ordinate Service Commission is represented through Mr. P. K. Shahi, learned Senior Advocate. Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, learned SC-8 appears on behalf of the State.
2. The entire se
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
