SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1481

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
JITENDRA KUMAR, J.
Avnish Kumar, Son of Kamlesh Kuwar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondents
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2609 of 2024
Decided On : 07-08-2025

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Vindhya Keshari Kumar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ravi Shankar Pathak, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP
For the Resp. No.2 :Ms. Smiti Bharti, Advocate

Bail for juveniles under Section 12 of the J.J. Act cannot be denied based solely on the seriousness of the offence; concrete grounds are required to support denial.

Headnote:

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015–Section 12–Bail to Juvenile–Petitioner, a Juvenile, has been denied bail–Offences under Sections 342, 363, 366 (A), 376 (AB) IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act–Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure or any other law for time being in force, bail to a Juvenile in conflict with law is governed by Section 12 of the J.J. Act, 2015–This Section is equally applicable to all juveniles in conflict with law without any discrimination of any nature–Even bail to a juvenile in conflict with law of the age between 16 to 18 years, being accused of heinous offence is governed by Section 12 of the J.J. Act, 2015–Moreover, under Section 12 of the J.J. Act, bail to a Juvenile is a rule and the refusal of the same is an exception and it can be denied only on the three grounds as provided in the proviso to Section 12 (1) of the J.J. Act, 2015–Nature and seriousness of the alleged offence is not relevant for consideration of bail under Section 12 of the J.J. Act–"The ends of justice" as used in the proviso to Section 12 (1) of the J.J. Act is drastically different to one as used in general criminal jurisprudence–If the detention of juvenile at Observation Home or other institutions as contemplated under the J.J. Act is helpful in protection, development and rehabilitation of the juvenile, only then it can be said that release of the child would defeat the ends of justice–Denial of bail must be reasoned–Perusal of Social Investigation Report is one of the important material to be perused in terms of Section 15 (2) of the J.J. Act–In the present case there is no basis as per the social Investigation Report and case diary for denial of bail–There is also no proof that after release, the appellant may go into association of criminals–The finding regarding the criminals in whose association the juvenile may go, is required to be recorded–But there is no such finding–F.I.R. lodged after three days of occurrence–Medico legal examination of the alleged victim does not support the prosecution case–Impugned order is not sustainable and accordingly set aside–Appeal allowed–Appellant directed to be released on bail.             (Paras 39, 44, 47, 51 & 52)

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. registration and charges against the appellant. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguments by the appellant. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. arguments by the state and informant. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. legal provisions regarding bail to juveniles under j.j. act. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
6. observations on treatment of juveniles. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
7. judicial perspectives on juvenile bail. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)
8. court's analysis and findings on the appeal. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51)
9. final ruling and order. (Para 52)

JUDGMENT

Introduction

The present Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the Appellant against the impugned order dated 16.04.2024, passed by learned A.D.J.-Ist-Cum-P.O. (Children Court), Sitamarhi in Sitamarhi Mahila P.S. Case No. 27 of 2023 (Trial No. 1 of 2024) whereby learned Children Court has rejected the bail application of the Appellant, holding as follows:

“From perusal of record and the case-diary. It transpires that the witnesses in the case-diary have supported the prosecution case. The victim has also supported the incident in her statement u/s. 164 Cr.P.C. It also appears from the record that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case against the petitioner for the offences u/s. 342, 363, 366(A), 376 (AB) I.P.C. and Sec. 6 of POCSO Act . From perusal of case-diary, it appears that the victim has made specific allegation against the C.C.L. 'A" in her statement u/s. 161 Cr.P.C. and in her statement u/s. 164 -Cr.P.C. The Social Investigation Report is available on the record. It appears that the effect of the association of bad society is the reason of said offence. Therefore, the atmosphere outside the Observation Home is not conducive for the C.C.L. 'A' as there is every possibility that the C.C.L.'A' would come in the association of criminals and would commit another offence and since the nature of offence is heinous. Hence, the release of the C.C.L. would not only expose him to moral, physical and psychological danger but would also lead to defeat the ends of justice. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and seriousness of the offence I am not inclined to grant bail to the C.C.L.'A'. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is hereby rejected.”

Prosecution Case

2. The prosecution case, as emerging from the written report of the mother of the victim dated 07.09.2023, is that when the three year old minor daughter of the informant was playing in front of her house at 7:00 PM in the evening on 04.09.2023, she was enticed away by the Appellant to his house, where he committed rape upon her. Subsequent to the occurrence, the victim came to the informant weeping and stated to her that the Appellant had undressed her. From the perusal of her person, it appears to the informant that she was subjected to rape and the clothes of the victim was stained with blood. It is also stated that the victim was carrying chips in her one hand.

Social Investigation Report

3. Social Investigation Report is on record, as per which both the parents of the Appellant are alive and they are fifty years of age. The Appellant has also two brothers and three sisters and both the brothers are educated and they are involved in cultivation. Even his grandfather, aged about 70 years is alive and he is also educated up to intermediate. As per further report, the behavior of the Appellant towards the family members is cordial. He is also religious and he has no habit of any smoking, drinking, gambling or begging. He plays cricket and likes reading books and religious activities. He is obedient to his parents and he contributes to the business of his family. He is a student of B.A. (Hons.), Ist Year. He has also taken computer training and his attitude towards his friends is positive. As per the neighbors, his conduct is good. His ne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top