Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
JITENDRA KUMAR
Ajay Kumar, Son of Raktu Sah – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of seizure of a vehicle in drug case (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against the petitioner's vehicle release (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. explains laws regarding seizure and disposal under ndps act (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. jurisdiction of special court on interim vehicle custody (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. decision to allow interim release of the vehicle (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT :
Introduction
Factual Background
3. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. He is, undisputedly, the registered owner of the car and he is no way involved in the commission of the alleged offence, and hence, the Petitioner is not even made accused in the case by the police. He further submits that the car is a transport vehicle used for commercial purpose and he has entrusted the vehicle to one driver for running the vehicle on hire. Hence, he is not aware of the commission of any offence by the driver or any passenger. He also submits that even as per the report received by th
A registered owner of a vehicle seized in connection with a narcotics offence, who is not an accused, is entitled to interim custody of the vehicle, subject to meeting certain conditions to ensure co....
Confiscation and release of vehicle – Decision regarding confiscation of any article can be taken only by Special Court and only after conviction, acquittal or discharge – There is no provision for p....
The Special Court under the NDPS Act can grant interim custody of seized vehicles, provided the owner proves non-involvement in the offence, despite potential confiscation.
The Special Court has exclusive jurisdiction to grant interim custody of seized vehicles under the NDPS Act, ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice.
Interim custody of property seized under drug law is granted to uncharged owners unless proven involved, affirming their rights within legal frameworks established.
The court ruled that a vehicle seized under the NDPS Act can be released on interim custody unless the owner is implicated in the unlawful use, affirming the application of Sections 451 and 457 of th....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the power to decide the claim of a person regarding a seized conveyance lies with the special court under Section 60 and 63 of the NDPS Act, a....
The ownership of a vehicle seized under NDPS Act must be respected if the owner proves lack of knowledge of its illegal use; interim custody can be granted subject to conditions.
The owner of a vehicle seized in connection with an NDPS offence can claim its release if proved unconnected with the crime, emphasizing the need for judicial scrutiny in such cases.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
