Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Ramesh Chand Malviya, J
Md. Shaheed Alam – Appellant
Versus
Bijay Pandey – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of landlord-tenant relationship (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding necessity and default (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's observations on validity of eviction (Para 9 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. ratio decidendi on maintainability of eviction (Para 12 , 19 , 22) |
| 5. final conclusion and order (Para 23 , 24) |
ORDER
9 19-12-2025
This Civil Revision application no: 166 of 2024 has been filed under Section 14 (8) of the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as “BBC Act”) against the judgment and decree dated 17.10.2024 passed by learned Shri Upender Shah, civil Judge (Sr. Division VIII), Patna in Eviction Suit No. 66 of 2022 whereby and whereunder the Learned trial Court allowed the eviction suit filed by the Plaintiffs/respondents directing the defendants/petitioner to vacate the suit premise mentioned in Schedule-I of the plaint within sixty days from the date of order, failing which the respondents shall be at liberty to obtain eviction of the petitioner through the process of the Court and the costs incurred over the same shall be recoverable from the defendant.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
