SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1514

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Sunita – Appellant
Versus
Parveen – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.A. Sheoran, Advocate

Table of Content
1. challenge to execution order based on procedural flaws. (Para 1)
2. impugned order set aside for improper adherence to procedural law. (Para 3)
3. final directive for reconsideration of pending application. (Para 4 , 5)

JUDGMENT :

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J .

1. This revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court, challenging the order dated 06.09.2025 (Annexure P-20). By the said order, the objection petition filed by the petitioner in the execution proceedings was dismissed, and attachment of the petitioner’s salary was directed. The petitioner seeks to impugn the legality, propriety, and correctness of the impugned order, contending that it has been passed without due consideration of the facts and submissions raised in the objection petition, thereby necessitating interference under the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court.

2. The primary objection of the petitioner is that he has filed an application for setting aside the ex-parte decree under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure (here-in-after to be ‘CPC’), which application is still pending consideration before the Cour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top