IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Date of decision :08.01.2026

ASHA RANI AND OTHERS ... PETITIONERS

VERSUS

TARSEM KUMAR AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL

Present: Mr. Pankaj Maini, Advocate

for the petitioners.

****

PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 11.12.2024 passed by the Executing Court dismissing their objections, as contained in Annexure P-8 dated 04.11.2024. It is prayed that the entire execution proceedings be declared

vitiated and be set-aside.

2. The respondents–plaintiffs had filed a suit for possession as owners of the suit property along with a prayer for permanent injunction against the petitioners–defendants. The said suit, after due contest, was decreed by the Court of the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), S.A.S. Nagar, vide judgment and decree dated 30.04.2024. The operative part of the judgment and decree is

reproduced hereinbelow:

“27. In view of my aforesaid findings, suit of the plaintiffs succeeds and same is hereby partly decreed with costs. Defendants are directed to vacate suit property, as described in the head note of the plaint within three months from today and to han