IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

-.-

RSA-1354-1993 (O&M) Reserved on:-22.12.2025

Pronounced on:- 08.01.2026

Uploaded on:-09.01.2026

Whether only operative part of the judgment is

Pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: operative part/full judgment

Krishan Chand (since deceased) through LRs ....Appellants

VERSUS

Bharto (Since deceased) through LRs ....Respondents

CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU

Present: Mr. Anil Rathee, Advocate and

Mr. Tanvir Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sanjay Majithia, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Sumit Sinha, Advocate for the respondent.

-.-

MANDEEP PANNU, J.

1. This Regular Second Appeal has been preferred by the appellants legal representatives of original defendant No.1 Krishan Chand, against the judgment and decree dated 09.04.1993 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Sonepat, whereby the learned First Appellate Court set aside the judgment and decree dated 18.01.1989 passed by the Court of Sub Judge, Sonepat, and decreed the suit of the plaintiff-respondent Smt. Bharto for declaration, thereby declaring the decree dated 02.01.1981 in Civil Suit No. 691/1980 as well as the subsequent sale deed dated 11.01.1988 as