SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 239

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TILAK RAJ AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Reserved on:24.12.2025

Pronounced on: 12.01.2026

Uploaded on: 12.01.2026

Sh. Tilak Raj and others

......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another

......Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR

Argued by: - Mr. Baldev Singh Sodhi, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

Mr. Satnampreet Singh, DAG, Punjab.

NAMIT KUMAR, J.

1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to give minimum regular pay scale, dearness allowance and grade pay to the petitioners at par with similarly situated co-employees, according to the principles/law laid down in CWP-19238 of 2013 – Amrish Sharma and others v. State of Punjab and others decided on 26.02.2024, which has been upheld by a Division Bench of this Court in LPA-2032 of 2024 – State of Punjab

and others v. Sarwan Ram and others decided on 16.05.2025.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners have worked as Baildars on daily wage basis with the

respondent-department for more than 20 years and all the petitioners have been relieved from service at the age

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top