Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, J
Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ganesh Rice Mills – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual context confirms arbitration proceedings commenced prior to the 2015 amendment act. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 37 , 38) |
| 2. prospective application of section 12(5) and the 2015 amendment to arbitral proceedings. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. execution courts cannot apply the 2015 amendment act retrospectively to pre-existing arbitral awards. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 4. revision petitions allowed; execution proceedings must proceed per pre-amendment legal standards. (Para 39) |
JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J.
1. By this common judgment, a bunch of seven Civil Revision Petitions bearing Nos.CR-5847-2025, CR-8920-2025, CR-8878-2025, CR-9445-2025, CR-8589-2025, CR-7999-2025 and CR-6164-2025 is being decided. In all the aforesaid revision petitions, an important question of law has arisen because of which the same are being taken up together for adjudication. For the sake of convenience and brevity, the facts are being taken from CR-5847-2025.
2. For the purpose of methodical elucidation and structure, this judgment is arranged under the following heads:-
| A. | FACTUAL MATRI |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
