Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
SUNIL BENIWAL
Sandeep Kumar, S/o Hira Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary Department Of Medical And Health – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's context regarding examination and attendance issues. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments based on judicial custody and treatment. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents' opposition and criteria for attendance. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's observations on attendance accountability. (Para 6) |
| 5. court's reasoning for adherence to mbbs attendance norms. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. court's orders regarding attendance and future examinations. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 7. finalization of all pending applications. (Para 11) |
Order :
SUNIL BENIWAL, J.
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents to permit the petitioner to appear in the Second Year MBBS (Main) Examination scheduled to commence from 26.07.2025, to conduct remedial classes for all subjects, and to allow the petitioner to appear in the supplementary examination.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was admitted to the MBBS Course at the Government Medical College, Bhilwara in the year 2024. Subsequently, an FIR was lodged against him at Police Station Shastri Nagar, Patna for offences under Sections 407 , 408, 409, and 120-B of the IPC , alleging his involvement in the NEET examination paper le
Medical students facing judicial proceedings may be granted exceptions to attendance policies to preserve their academic careers, subject to fulfilling necessary criteria for examinations.
Attendance requirements for medical education are stringent and must be upheld to maintain educational standards, despite individual circumstances.
Attendance requirements for medical examinations must be strictly adhered to, and remedial classes do not retroactively qualify students for supplementary examinations.
The adherence to minimum attendance requirements is essential in university regulations, and non-compliance undermines eligibility to sit for examinations.
No automatic bar to college attendance due to pending criminal case; eligibility for exams requires 75% attendance.
The Head of Institution must forward applications for attendance condonation to the Controller of Examinations; summary rejection is unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
