Back
SUPREME COURT
, J
In re: v. Mehar Singh Saini Chairman HPSC and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. importance of integrity in public service commissions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. factual background of the reference and irregularities. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. jurisdictional scope of the inquiry under article 317. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. nature of the inquiry under article 317 of the constitution. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. difference between misbehaviour and misconduct. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 6. evidence must meet the expected standards for public officials. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 7. consequences of failing to uphold standards in public service. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 8. respondents found guilty of misbehaviour and justified removal. (Para 85 , 86 , 87) |
1. Historically, the constituent assembly debates reflect the desire of. the framers of the Constitution to ensure complete independence, integrity and fairness in the country's administration. Besides discernibly stating the privileges, functions and responsibilities of the three paramount pillars of the Indian Constitution, i.e. legislature, executive and judiciary, the Constitution also provided three instruments to ensure proper
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
