Back
B.S.Chauhan, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, JJ
Venkataraja & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Vidyane Doureradjaperumal (D) Thr.Lrs. & Ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts establishing the origin of the property. (Para 2) |
| 2. chronology of legal actions regarding property ownership. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. arguments made by the appellants highlighting legal errors. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's reasoning on the necessity of consequential relief. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. conclusion that the appeal lacks merit. (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT
1. These appeals have been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 12.12.2003 passed by the High Court of Madras in Second Appeal Nos. 1536-1537 of 1991, by way of which the common judgment and decree passed by the First Additional District Judge in A.S. No. 198 of 1983 and A.S. No. 43 of 1988 were set aside, and the suit O.S. No. 58 of 1982, was dismissed, holding that the suit filed by the plaintiff, father of the appellant herein, is not maintainable.
A. The suit property i.e. House No. 9/39, Savaripadayatchi Street, Nellithope, Pondicherry, originally belonged to the deceased appellant/great grandfather Vengadachala Naicker, son of Ayyamperumal Naicker. He donated the above-mentioned suit property on 13.12.1896 in favour of his minor grandsons Radja Row and Kichnadji Ro
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
