Rs.14,10,407/-. But, the Opposite Party did not take into consideration the report of Surveyor and she was offered an amount of Rs.5,46,000/- only by Opposite Party. On 15.09.1985, she was asked to sign the receipt for a sum of Rs.5,46,000/-, but the officials of Opposite Party maliciously inscribed the words “full and final settlement” on the above receipt signed by her.

4. It was the further case of Complainant that she did not sign the receipt for a sum of Rs.5,46,000/- towards full and final settlement of her claim. But, the Opposite Party obtained her signatures thereon by misleading and thereafter, added the words "full and final settlement."

5. Thus, she filed the complaint against the Opposite Party for direction to pay her the balance amount of Rs.8,64,407/- in terms of the Surveyor's report alongwith with compensation and litigation cost.

6. However, the complaint filed by the Complainant was dismissed by Ld District Forum on 10.03.2004 on the ground that the services of OP were availed by her for commercial purposes.

7. Thereafter, the Complainant preferred an appeal before this Commission for setting aside the order dated 10.03.2004 passed by Ld District Forum and the Commi