Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, J
Oruganti Janardhan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana AND 5 OTHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims ownership of ancestral agricultural land. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondent no.6 argues possession and validity of sale. (Para 4) |
| 3. court analyzes procedural compliance under ror act. (Para 5) |
| 4. court concludes on procedural violations leading to setting aside of the order. (Para 6) |
ORDER
Heard Mr. Ch. Ravinder, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 5 and Mr. Ponnam Ashok Goud, learned counsel for respondent No.6. Perused original record.
2. This writ of certiorari is filed to call for the records including the order passed in New Case No.F2/Spl.Tribunal/303/2021 (Old Case No.B/2466/2019 at Old Revenue Court, RDO, Devarkonda), dated 04.02.2021 and review orders passed in new case dated 04.07.2021 by respondent No.2 and consequently allow the appeal filed by the petitioner.
3. CASE OF THE PETITIONER
i) He is the absolute owner and possessor of agricultural land admeasuring Ac.0.13 guntas in Survey No.382/AA; Acs.4.17 guntas in Survey No.383/AA and Acs.1.05 guntas in Survey No.396/AA, making a total extent of Acs.5.35 guntas, situated at Koppole Village,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
