P.NAVEEN RAO
Vallakati Yadagiri, s/o. late Pentaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Revenue Department – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard, Mr. Palle Sriharinath learned counsel for petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents.
2. The material averments and documents placed on record would disclose that petitioners 1, 2, husband of petitioner No.5 and late Vallakati Laxmaiah are the sons of late Pentaiah, and petitioners 3 and 4 are the daughters-in-law of late Laxmaiah. Petitioners claim that late Pentaiah purchased the land to an extent of Ac.1.05 guntas in Sy.No.1567/A of Ramayampet village and mandal, Medak district, by way of unregistered sale deed dated 28.01.1964 from the then pattadar Sri Alladi Bhoomaiah. In acknowledgment of payment of full sale consideration, the then pattadar also issued receipt, attested by his sons and late Pentaiah was inducted into physical possession of the subject land and ever since the family has been in possession and enjoyment of the said extent of land. The name of late Pentaiah was recorded in the revenue records against possession column. He was also issued Rythu Passbook. Late Pentaiah applied to validate unregistered sale deed. During the pendency of proceedings, he died. Thereafter, successors-in-interest to late Pentaiah prosecuted
A.P. State Financial Corporation v. Gar Re-Rolling Mills
Chinnam Pandurangam v. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Serilingampally Mandal and others
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research and Another Vs. K G S Bhatt
Gadde Venkateswara Rao V. Government of A.P.
Kalasagaram, Secunderabad Cultural Association Vs State of Andhra Pradesh
M.C.Mehta Vs. Union of India and Others
Ramniklal N Bhutta Vs. State of Maharastra
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.