Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
Dodda Gandhi Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Siripurapu Sudharshana Rao – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff seeks specific performance of sale agreement. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. trial court dismissed plaintiff's suit. (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. parties' arguments regarding the sale agreement. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. evidence surrounding the execution of agreement. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 15) |
| 5. legal position on enforceability of sale agreements. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. court's conclusions on specific performance and readiness. (Para 22 , 23 , 39) |
| 7. final order: part dismissal of appeal, refund owed. (Para 41 , 42) |
JUDGMENT :
Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy, J.
This Appeal Suit is filed by the appellant/plaintiff against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.07.2012 in O.S. No. 8 of 2008 on the file of I Additional District Judge, Khammam, wherein the suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant for specific performance was dismissed.
2. For the sake of convenience the parties will be referred as per their status before the trial Court.
I. BRIEF FACTS
3. The sole plaintiff instituted O.S. No. 8 of 2008 against the sole defendant seeking Specific Performance of an Agreement of Sale in respect of agricultural land admeasuring Ac.2-08 guntas in Sy.No.9 of Raghunadhapalem Village, Khammam Urban Ma
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
