SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 935

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
VIGNESWARAN NITTIYANANTHAN – Appellant
Versus
SIVA PAKKIAM RAMASAMY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Evrol Mariette Peters J:

Introduction

[1] This was the Petitioner-husband's application in encl 219, pursuant to Order 52 r 4 of the Rules of Court 2012 ("Rules of Court"), to cite the Respondent-wife for contempt, for non-compliance with the terms of a consent order dated 8 May 2024.

The Factual Background

[2] The Petitioner and Respondent (collectively "the Parties"), both aged 45 years old at the time of the hearing of this application, were married in December 2011, and welcomed a son ("the Child"), in November 2014.

[3] In March 2016, the Petitioner filed a divorce petition, which led to the dissolution of the marriage by a Court Order dated 29 June 2018 ("the June 2018 Court Order"). According to the terms of the June 2018 Court Order, joint guardianship of the Child was granted to the Parties, with custody, care, and control awarded solely to the Respondent.

[4] The Petitioner was granted access to the Child pursuant to the June 2018 Court Order, the relevant terms of which read:

1) Hak penjagaan (";guardianship";) bersama bagi anak perkahwinan KAJ diberikan kepada Pempetisyen Suami dan Responden Isteri;

...

3) Pempetisyen Suami diberikan akses pada setiap minggu dari hari Ju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top