Back
HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK KUCHING
KTM TRANSFORMERS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
WACHONG GLASS SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the appeal and decision (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. factual background of the case (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. plaintiff's arguments on breach of contract (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 22) |
| 4. court's observations on plaintiff's claims (Para 18 , 20 , 21 , 23) |
| 5. damages claimed by the plaintiff (Para 24 , 26) |
| 6. defendant's arguments and rebuttals (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 37) |
| 7. court's observations on defendant's claims (Para 38 , 39 , 41 , 42 , 44 , 45) |
| 8. findings on the agreement and obligations (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 9. court's reasoning on obligations and delays (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 10. final decision and orders (Para 63 , 64) |
Introduction
[1] This is the Appellant's (Plaintiff) appeal against the whole decision of the Magistrate given at Kuching on 15 February 2024 in dismissing the Appellant's claims with costs of RM10,325.00. The grounds of appeal are set out in the Appellant's Memorandum of Appeal at pp 14 - 17 of Part A, Record of Appeal.
[2] The Respondent (Defendant) did not appeal against the dismissal of their Counterclaim. As such, the issue of Counterclaim will not be
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
