Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MACVILLA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MERVYN PETER GUAN YIN HUI & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. multiple appeals heard together require a singular judgment for efficiency. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the jurisprudence regarding sections 74 and 75 is essential for determining compensation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. key questions clarifying the application of statutory contracts arise from previous cases. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. conclusions drawn on the application of ss 74 and 75. (Para 8 , 55) |
| 5. the relationship between statutory contracts and the contracts act is pivotal for appeal outcomes. (Para 15 , 18 , 28) |
| 6. nature of the appeal in relation to homebuyers and the tribunal's award. (Para 29) |
| 7. the conclusion affirms tribunal authority, emphasizing just compensation. (Para 54) |
[1] There were 7 appeals filed by the same appellant which were fixed before us for hearing on 12 July 2019. We heard all parties. All parties agreed that it will be sufficient to deal with appeal No W-01(A)-218-03/2018 (218) and they will be bound by the decision of this court in relation to the other appeals.
[2] The 7 appeals are as follows: (a) W-01(A)-218-03/2018; (b) W-01(A)- 219-03/2018; (c) W-01(A)-220-03/2018; (d) W-01(A)-221-03/2018; (e) W- 01(A)-222-03/2018; (f) W-01(A)-223-03/2018; (g) W-01(A)-224-03/201
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
