Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
CHAN LENNON – Appellant
Versus
TAN HUEY ZI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal regarding discovery of bank statements. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. key issue of appealable errors in discovery. (Para 3) |
| 3. background facts of financial transactions. (Para 4) |
| 4. arguments concerning relevance and necessity for discovery. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. court's decision on discovery application. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. legal principles governing discovery under o 24. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. reassessment of necessity for documents after november. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 8. relevant case law supporting discovery application. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 9. clarification of principles applied to specific facts. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 10. costs decision on appeal outcomes. (Para 22) |
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal by the Appellant (D1 in the Sessions Court ) against thedecision of the Sessions Court on 26 July 2024 in allowing the Respondent's(D2 in the Sessions Court ) application pursuant to O 24 for discovery ofdocuments (in the form of bank statements).
[2] To all intents and purposes, this discovery application relates to twodistinct documents. The first is the Appellant's bank statement forNovember, 2022 and the second are the Appellant's bank statements afterNovember,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
