SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 59

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MEN – Appellant
Versus
TEN – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ng Kee Way ,Respondent Advocate: Chris Chin,Tan Han Rui

JUDGMENT

Evrol Mariette Peters J:

Introduction

[1] This was an application ("this Application") by the Petitioner-Wife to vary the terms of a consent order recorded by both the Petitioner-Wife and Petitioner-Husband on 11 November 2019 ("the Court Order").

[2] In the interest of the privacy of the parties concerned, and sensitivity of the issues in these proceedings, the Petitioners have been anonymised in this judgment as MEN and TEN respectively, whilst the children of the marriage have been anonymised respectively as ONG and ING.

The Factual Background

[3] The Petitioners ("the Parties") filed a joint petition for divorce in October 2019 and in November 2019, the decree nisi was granted. In February 2020, it was made absolute on the agreement that the Petitioner- Husband would be granted sole custody, care, and control of the children of the marriage ("the Children") born respectively in 2013 and 2015, whilst the Petitioner-Wife would be given reasonable access to the Children.

[4] The relevant paragraphs in the Court Order are as follows:

(b) Hak jagaan tunggal dan kawalan terhadap anak-anak tersebut diberikan kepada Pempetisyen Suami;

(c) Pempetisyen Isteri mempunyai akses yang munasab


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top