HIGH COURT MALAYA TAIPING
ONG JIA HAO – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL MAJID OTHMAN & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties filed appeals against sessions court decision. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties presented preliminary objections. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court dismissed plaintiff's po, awarded costs. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court analyzed appealability of decisions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
Background
[1] The parties will be referred to as they were at the Sessions Court for ease of reference, as there were 2 notices of appeal filed separately to the High Court by the Plaintiff and Defendants against the whole decision of the Sessions Court in Taiping on 9 March 2022 that had allowed the Plaintiff's claim but apportioned liability at 80% to the Plaintiff and 20% to the Defendants. Appeal No AB-12BNCvC-4-03/2022 was filed by the Plaintiff on 17 March 2022 whereas Appeal No AB-12BNCvC-6-03/2022 was filed by the Defendants on 23 March 2022. By a Court order dated 7 February 2023 the 2 appeals were ordered to be heard together. The hearing of the appeals was fixed on 27 April 2023.
[2] The Plaintiffs solicitor then filed a letter dated 21 March 2023 in respect of Appeal No AB-12BNCvC-6-03/2022 giving notice of a Preliminary Objection (PO)
Kempadang Bersatu Sdn Bhd v. Perkayuan OKS No 2 Sdn Bhd
Christopher Bandi v. Tumbung Nakis & Anor; Jamil Sindi (Third Party)
Mulpha International Bhd & Ors v. Mula Holdings sdn Bhd & Ors & Another Appeal
Hong Leong Finance Bhd v. Low Thiam Hoe & Another Appeal
Syarikat Tingan Lumber Sdn Bhd v. Takang Timber Sdn Bhd
Asia Pacific Higher Learning Sdn Bhd v. Majlis Perubatan Malaysia & Anor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.