HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
NICSMANN MACAN SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
KER PAYD HOCK & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. covid-19 led to drastic business impacts and disputes surrounding consent judgments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. consent judgments can only be overturned if proven coerced; voluntary compliance negates such claims. (Para 34 , 35 , 41) |
| 3. defamation claims were not substantiated due to lack of evidence. (Para 92 , 93) |
Introduction
[1] On 13 March 2020 the World Health Organisation declared the outbreak of the Covid-19 as a global pandemic. In Malaysia, a nationwide movement control was imposed beginning from 18 March 2020 to curb and contain the spread in the country. During the imposition of the movement control order ('MCO'), restaurants and eateries could only cater for food delivery services and this had adversely affected the viability of many food and beverage industries.
[2] Like many others, the parties involved in this case were not spared of the debilitating and devastating impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. Just immediately prior to the onset of the pandemic, the Defendants invested in the Plaintiffs to start a restaurant business based on certain representations. The business had barely started for less than a month before the MCO was imposed.
[3] The








Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.