Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
BAHEERATHY ARUMUGAM – Appellant
Versus
V GUNASELAN V VISVANATHAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for divorce and ancillary reliefs. (Para 1 , 1 , 2) |
| 2. pw's revised prayer for no access. (Para 3) |
| 3. background facts of the marriage and separation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's decision on the divorce petition. (Para 8) |
| 5. analysis of guardianship and custody considerations. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. welfare of the child in decisions on access. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. evidence of abuse impacting child welfare. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. counterarguments denying abuse. (Para 46 , 47 , 49) |
| 9. children's interviews indicating fear. (Para 55 , 62) |
| 10. determination of maintenance responsibilities. (Para 63 , 72) |
| 11. maintenance for children. (Para 67) |
| 12. division of matrimonial assets. (Para 73 , 75 , 79 , 82 , 107) |
| 13. claims regarding the return of jewellery. (Para 110 , 111) |
| 14. claims for return of jewellery dismissed. (Para 112) |
| 15. psychiatric evaluations related to fitness as a parent. (Para 114 , 115 , 116) |
| 16. court orders on psychiatric evaluations. (Para 117) |
[1] This is my judgment regarding the Divorce Petition filed by the Petitioner Wife ("the PW") in enclosure 1, and the Cross-Petition of the Respondent Husband ("the RH"
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
