Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TASPUTRA PERKIM – Appellant
Versus
KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN TENAGA KERJA SEMENANJUNG MALAYSIA & ORS (ENCLS 1 & 3) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details about the applicant's request for judicial review. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. judicial review applications must adhere to time limits. (Para 6 , 8 , 20) |
| 3. the importance of exhausting alternative legal remedies before seeking judicial review. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 22) |
| 4. the courts provide a supervisory and not appellate function during judicial review. (Para 34 , 36 , 40) |
| 5. final decision to dismiss the application due to failure to comply with procedural requirements. (Para 42 , 43) |
Introduction
[1] The Applicant filed an application for leave to commence judicial review proceeding (Encl 1) under O 53 of the Rules of 2012 (ROC) seeking inter alia the following orders:
[1.1] That Leave is given to the abovenamed Applicant to apply for a Certiorari Order to be produced and to set aside or revoke the Sealed Order in the case of the summons of the Director General of Labour No KBR/11401/2020/1037 dated 2 November 2020;
[1.2] That extension of time is given to the abovenamed Applicant to apply for a Certiorari Order to be produced and to set aside or revoke the Sealed Order in the case of the summons of the Director General of Labour No KBR/1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
