Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
UMNO BAHAGIAN PEKAN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the forfeiture action and the applicant's motion. (Para 1 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. application for striking out the forfeiture action. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments about the applicability and relevance of section 9(c) of the societies act. (Para 7 , 14 , 17 , 32) |
| 4. non-compliance with legislative requirements. (Para 18 , 25) |
| 5. court's evaluation of section 56's nature and implications of procedural violations. (Para 24 , 26 , 49) |
| 6. applicability of s 9(c) of the societies act 1966. (Para 34) |
[1] This is an application filed by the applicant to strike out the respondent's notice of motion dated 19 June 2019 and all the related affidavits filed by the respondent in the Kuala Lumpur High Court Criminal Application No: WA-44-128-06-2019 involving a forfeiture action instituted against the applicant pursuant to ss 56(1) and 61(2) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 ("AMLATFPUAA").
[2] At the conclusion of the hearing, I dismissed the application, and highlighted the primary reasons for the same. This judgment sets out the full reasons for the dismissal.
Key Background Facts
[3] On 19 June 2019, the respondent fil
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
