SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 812

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
NATHAN RAJANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Harpal Singh ,Respondent Advocate: Nurul Farhana Khalid

JUDGMENT

See Mee Chun JCA:

Introduction

[1] Enclosure 1 is a Notice of Motion dated 1 June 2021 filed by the Applicant/ Accused that he be released on bail pending on going criminal proceedings vide case no WA-45SO-4-03/2021 against him. He also seeks an order that the offence under s 124K of the Penal Code does not fall under the ambit of the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 [Act 747] ( SOSMA ).

The Charge

[2] The Applicant was charged under s 124K of the Penal Code and the details are as follows:

"Pada menjalankan kuasa-kuasa yang diberikan di bawah s 177A(1) Kanun Tatacara Jenayah dan terletak hakpada saya menurut s 376(3) kanun yang sama, saya MUHAMAD ISKANDAR BIN AHMAD, Timbalan Pendakwa Raya, Negeri Selangor Darul Ehsan dengan ini memberi izin bagi pendakwaan terhadap:

1. NATHAN A/L RAJADRAN (No KP: 771205-14-5285)

2. LIM KIAN AIK (No KP: 780116-14-5519)

Bagi kesalahan melakukan sabotaj dengan niat untuk mendatangkan mudarat kepada perkhidmatan air di Negeri Selangor dan merupakan satu kesalahan di bawah s 124(K) Kanun Keseksaan yang dikatakan telah dilakukan antara 2 haribulan sehingga 10 haribulan November 2020 bertempat dipermis No 32 Jalan Velox 2 Taman Velox, Raw

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top