CHAI SAY FAH vs HARTAWAN AMAN SDN BHD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2015 MarsdenLR 1632

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
CHAI SAY FAH – Appellant
Versus
HARTAWAN AMAN SDN BHD – Respondent

Table of Content
1. the orders under challenge were sought to be set aside based on claims of irregularity and fraud. (Para 1 , 2 , 9)
2. order details and the context of the requests were crucial in determining the validity of the appeal. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. service and fair hearing principles govern the foundation of legal contests. (Para 10 , 16 , 17)
4. the court emphasized judicial discretion in reinstating matters based on fair trial rights. (Para 11 , 12)

Abdul Wahab Patail JCA:

[1] The 2^nd defendant, Chai Say Fah ("the appellant") appealed against the decision of the High Court dismissing the appellant's application vide summons in chambers encl 14 ("encl 14") to set aside the orders made on 15 January 2003, 13 January 2003 and 21 March 2003.

[2] The basis of the reasoning of the High Court is contained in this passage of the grounds of judgment on encl 14:

"B. Keputusan dan Alasan-Alasannya

Setelah menyemak dan meneliti kertas-kertas kausa dan mendengar serta menimbangkan hujahan bertulis dan lisan dari peguam kedua-dua pihak, dengan sandaran nas dari keputusan kes-kes mahkamah yang lebih tinggi, mahkamah mendapati bahawa perintah-perintah mahkamah yang dibuat dalam kes ini pada 15

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2015 MarsdenLR 1632

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYACHAI SAY FAH – AppellantVersusHARTAWAN AMAN SDN BHD – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
CHAI SAY FAH – Appellant
Versus
HARTAWAN AMAN SDN BHD – Respondent