SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 MarsdenLR 702

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
JOSEPH PAULUS LANTIP – Appellant
Versus
TNIO CHEE CHANG AND ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Chen Kok On,Sonny Durai ,Respondent Advocate: Alex Siew

JUDGMENT

Mary Lim Thiam Suan JCA:

[1] These two related appeals were respectively filed by the 1st and 2nd defendants. The High Court had allowed the respondent's claim for specific performance of an agreement to extract timber and had further ordered the appellants to pay damages in the sum of RM2,680,511.68 for the timber extracted. Upon full consideration of the submissions, the records of appeal and the grounds of judgment, both appeals were unanimously allowed.

[2] For ease of reference, the parties will be referred to as they were at the High Court.

Material Background

[3] The 1st defendant is the registered and beneficial owner of a total of 467 parcels of native titles lands located in Kampung Kieyap, Ranau and measuring an area of over 5,000 acres [the said lands]. Timber could be found on the said lands.

[4] On 22 March 2011, the plaintiff and the 1st defendant entered into an agreement wherein the 1st defendant agreed to sell to the plaintiff "all the Commercial Timber extracted from the said lands" irrespective of timber species at the rate of RM700,000.00 in which "20% shall be paid upon signing of this Agreement, putting on tractor on site 20%, issuance of Form I or Form II

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top