SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 MarsdenLR 1157

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
FAM MENG SIONG & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Karpal Singh,Sanjeet Kaur Deo ,Respondent Advocate: Mohamad Abazafree Mohamad Abbas DPP

[1] This is the majority judgment of the court. My learned sister, Justice Aziah Ali had seen this judgment in draft and expressed her agreement with it.

[2] We have before us an appeal by the appellants against their convictions on an alternative charge under s 149 of the Penal Code ('the Code') and punishable under s 302 of the said Code.

[3] Originally the first and second appellants (1st and 3rd accused in the High court below) were charged and tried for an offence of murder under s 302 of the Code read with s 304 of the Code together with the 2nd and 4th accused for causing the death of one Te Lui Yet ('deceased').

[4] In the midst of the trial at the High court, that is, after the 5th prosecution witness had given evidence, the learned Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) tendered an alternative charge under s 149 of the Code and punishable under s 302 of the Code against all the four accused together with fourteen others who were at large. Section 149 of the Code provides that where an offence is committed by any member of an unlawful assembly in prosecution of the common object of that assembly, or such members of that assembly knew to be likely to be committed in prosecution of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top