COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
YUNESWARAN RAMARAJ – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interpreting s 9(5) of the paa. (Para 1) |
| 2. failure to notify police as an offence. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. sessions court's findings on respondent's role. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. high court's determination on assembly. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. constitutionality of s 9(5) affirmed. (Para 84 , 85 , 87) |
Introduction
[1] This appeal concerns the interpretation of s 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 (" PAA ").
[2] The background facts giving rise to this appeal are these. The respondent was charged in his capacity as an organiser of an assembly, at the Sessions Court, Johor Bahru, an offence under s 9(1) of the PAA , which is punishable under s 9(5) of the same Act. The charge reads as follows:
"Bahawa kamu pada 15 Mei 2013 jam lebih kurang 8.30 malam, di pejabat Parti Keadilan Rakyat No 38, Jalan Baladu 19, Taman Puteri Wangsa, Ulu Tiram, dalam Daerah Johor Bahru, dalam Negeri Johor Darul Takzim, di mana Program Himpunan Black 505, Bantahan Terhadap SPR telah diadakan, sebagai penganjur program tersebut, kamu gagal memberitahu Ketua Polis Daerah Johor Bahru Selatan 10 hari sebelum program tersebut diadakan dan oleh y
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.