Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
PP – Appellant
Versus
HARINDRAN VEERAJAH & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused charged with murder. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. evidential findings and witness credibility. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 3. court's reasoning and evaluation of the case. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
[10] The prosecution called 8 witnesses in order to establish a prima facie case against the 4 accused pursuant to s 180 of the Criminal Procedure Code (the "CPC"). The 8 witnesses are as follows:
PW1, L/Corp 113825, Roslan Bin Zainal, the police officer who took down the first information report concerning the alleged attack on the deceased by a group of male Indians.
PW2, Thirumanan s/o Sagatawan, the son of the deceased, who witnessed the attack by the 4 accused and a few other male Indians still at large, on the deceased.
PW3, L/Corp 92817 Nazri Bin Zainal Abidin, the police photographer who was instructed to take photographs of the scene of the alleged crime committed by the 4 accused and a few other male Indians still at large.
PW4, Dr Khairul Azman Bin Ibrahim, the government consultant pathologist who performed
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
