COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
FOONG YOK KOK – Appellant
Versus
PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal by the appellant/plaintiff against the decision of the High Court Judge ('trial judge') given on 18 December 2017 after a full trial, in dismissing the appellant/plaintiff's claim and in allowing the respondent/defendant's counterclaim in the sum of RM234,940.28 with a global cost of RM15,000.00.
[2] The appellant/plaintiff was one of the pioneers and was responsible for the setting up of the Miri branch of the respondent/defendant company. He was promoted to the position as the Agency Manager. He hold the post until he retired in the respondent/defendant company.
[3] The appellant/plaintiff's claim was for the overriding commissions in respect of Liew Sze Chin's and Mesir Ting's units calculated from September 2013 until the date of judgment.
[4] The respondent/defendant counterclaimed for the refund of the sum of RM234,940.28 which was paid to the appellant/plaintiff under the mistaken belief that appellant/plaintiff was entitled to it as overriding commissions.
[5] We heard the appeal on 25 June 2019. After considering the submissions of parties on the issues raised in during the preliminary objection by the respondent/de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.