Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA IPOH
IBRAHIM MAHD NAZRI – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appeals and sentences. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the offences and guilty plea. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. discussion on appeal rights under cpc. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. principles of revisionary powers. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. assessment of guilty plea validity. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. arguments on understanding of guilty plea. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. court's evaluation of appellant's understanding. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. court's decision on sentencing errors. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 9. court's stance on judicial discretion. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
Introduction
[1] This appeal along with three (3) appeals a rise from the decision of the Sessions Court in Ipoh, where the appellant/accused in all the cases before Sessions Court admitted and pleaded guilty to offences under ss 14(a) and (d) and 16 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 (SOACA) in all the cases. These appeals were heard together. The following are the respective conviction and sentence for the charges against which the appellant is appealing:
a) Appeal: AA-42JSKS-2-07/2022 (Sessions Court case no: AA-62JSK-47-06/2022)
First Charge:
Under s 14(a) SOACA - 8 years' impr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
