PENTADBIR TANAH JOHOR BAHRU vs TANAH SUTERA DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 433

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PENTADBIR TANAH JOHOR BAHRU – Appellant
Versus
TANAH SUTERA DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Adi Radlan Abdul Rahman ,Respondent Advocate: Ibrahim Hashim,Haffirrudin Osman

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments presented by the parties. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. court's observations on procedural compliance. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
4. legal principles regarding appeals. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
5. final decision and orders. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129)

Lee Swee Seng JCA:

[1] Both parties have filed applications to derail the other in their appeals before the Court of Appeal. The appellant in its motion in encl 18 had prayed to extend the time to serve the record of appeal by one day for it was one day late in serving on the respondent, though filed within time. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 433

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYAPENTADBIR TANAH JOHOR BAHRU – AppellantVersusTANAH SUTERA DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Respondent

Cases Referred (6)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PENTADBIR TANAH JOHOR BAHRU – Appellant
Versus
TANAH SUTERA DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Respondent