BANK BUMIPUTRA MALAYSIA BERHAD CAWANGAN JOHOR BAHRU vs CHEONG YOKE CHOY; MALAYSIAN CENTRAL DEPOSITOR....

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2000 MarsdenLR 395

HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
BANK BUMIPUTRA MALAYSIA BERHAD CAWANGAN JOHOR BAHRU – Appellant
Versus
CHEONG YOKE CHOY; MALAYSIAN CENTRAL DEPOSITOR.... – Respondent

Table of Content
1. application for intervention focused on compliance with court orders under the securities act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. responses from legal parties outlining both necessity for order compliance and challenges to the intervener's request. (Para 4 , 12 , 13)
3. discussion on mareva injunctions and the need for full compliance with disclosure obligations. (Para 19 , 24)
4. assessment of the statutory obligations and rights regarding enforcement of orders. (Para 90)

Abdul Malik Ishak J:

Enclosure 28

[1] This was an application by way of a summons in chambers by the proposed intervener for the following orders:

(1) that the proposed intervener be granted leave to intervene and be made a party to this action and to take part in this action for the purpose of setting aside or of varying the orders of this honourable court made on 23 May 1998 (encl. 7), 1 June 1998 (encl. 12) and 18 May 1999 (encl. 30) respectively (hereinafter referred to as the "said orders");

(2) that the title of the proceedings be amended in subsequent proceedings in this action to include the name of the proposed intervener as intervener, such other title as this honourable court deems fit;

(3) that the said or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2000 MarsdenLR 395

HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRUBANK BUMIPUTRA MALAYSIA BERHAD CAWANGAN JOHOR BAHRU – AppellantVersusCHEONG YOKE CHOY; MALAYSIAN CENTRAL DEPOSITOR.... – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
BANK BUMIPUTRA MALAYSIA BERHAD CAWANGAN JOHOR BAHRU – Appellant
Versus
CHEONG YOKE CHOY; MALAYSIAN CENTRAL DEPOSITOR.... – Respondent