Back
HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK TAWAU
ABD HAMAN @ SAKARAN MOHD YASIN & ORS – Appellant
Versus
DATUK ZULKIFLI TUN MUSTAPHA & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs' claims based on land applications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. injunction application dismissed. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. lack of evidence for native customary rights. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. court's jurisdiction limitations on ncr claims. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. appeal process requirements. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. court cannot intervene in statutory decisions. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 7. injunctions against government are not allowed. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 8. discretion in land alienation by the director. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 9. no rights from unlawful occupation. (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
| 10. no constitutional violation in land claims. (Para 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 11. communal title is still valid. (Para 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76) |
| 12. counterclaims for trespass and damages. (Para 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85) |
| 13. nominal damages awarded due to insufficient proof. (Para 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93) |
| 14. final judgment and costs awarded. (Para 96 , 97 , 98) |
[1] The Plaintif
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
