SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 2240

SESSION COURT BUTTERWORTH
PP – Appellant
Versus
CHIN DIN CHUN & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Selvaranjini Selvaraja ,Respondent Advocate: Mohd Ismail Mophamed

Table of Content
1. child was allegedly trafficked under relevant statutes. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. legal standards for establishing a trafficking case. (Para 14 , 16 , 18)
3. outcome of the case based on evidentiary standards. (Para 38)
Julie Lack SCJ:

[1] The 1st and 2nd accused were charged under s 14 of the Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007 (Act 607) read together with s 34 of the Penal Code . The amended charge against them is as follows:

"Bahawa kamu di antara 2hb Januari 2010 hingga 14hb Januari 2010 bertempat di No 3, Jalan Cenderawasih 4, Taman Cenderawasih, 14300 Nibong Tebal, di dalam daerah Seberang Perai Selatan, di dalam negeri Pulau Pinang, telah memperdagangkan seorang kanak-kanak perempuan nama Low Ee Lin, no. sijil lahir: CG 41453, umur 4 tahun, bagi maksud eksploitasi di mana kamu telah melakukan suatu aktiviti yang menyalahi undang-undang iaitu kamu telah membuat pindaan hak ke atas kanak-kanak tersebut berlawanan dengan Seksyen 48 Akta Kanak-Kanak 2001, di mana kanak-kanak itu telah dipindah milik dari penjaga yang sah dengan balasan harga kepada Low Khim Cheng, KPT: 630815075609 dan Koay Seng Im, KPT: 700706075424. Oleh itu ka

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top